Video LoadingVideo UnavailableClick to playTap to playThe video will auto-play soon8CancelPlay now
Get email updates with the day’s biggest stories
Invalid EmailSomething went wrong, please try again later.Sign upWe use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time.More infoThank you for subscribingWe have more newslettersShow meSee ourprivacy notice
It may not have been wanted by a number of David Bowie devotees – including the singer’s own son Duncan Jones – but is Stardust worth the controversy that came with it?
Set in 1971, David Bowie (EMMA. star Johnny Flynn) heads out on a US publicity tour where he lies on the brink of true greatness but is in need of some guidance and ironically for Bowie, being brought back down to earth.
Paired with Mercury Records’ Ron Oberman ( Marc Maron ), Bowie faces some soul searching as this odd couple travels and the musician performs some rather disappointing gigs.
Amidst this, Bowie recalls a troubled familial background as the tour and his past help him in his transformation to become his iconic alter-ego of Ziggy Stardust.
So, does this film – made a mere four years after Bowie’s death – do justice to the Hunky Dory star?
Johnny Flynn stars as David Bowie heading out on his 1971 US publicity tour
All new Netflix movies to watch in 2021 as they vow to release one every week
Drag Race UK launch infuriates viewers as 'winner' is eliminated in first episode
Among the many pitfalls in Stardust, the most glaring has to be the lack of Bowie’s iconic songs, which are such a true example of his genius and staying power and of which convince the audience of the character’s true artistry.
While the admirable work of Johnny Flynn convinces us that the actor and musician has got some good pipes on him, he fails to deliver Bowie’s signature stage presence and when lacking the legendary songs of the singer, fails to make an impact.
Additionally, while convincing enough in showing some of Bowie’s personal traumas, the writing provided fails to offer any psychological insight into its subject, proving the death knell in Flynn’s attempt at a portrait of Bowie.
Jena Malone stars as the musician's first wife, Angie Bowie
Bowie heads out on a difficult journey across the US
Pieces of a Woman review: Vanessa Kirby is 'exceptionally powerful' in tale of grief
There is no convincing, detailed or well-drawn journey here and instead his character arc feels half-hearted. Also absent is an almost alien-like uniqueness to the Bowie we see on-screen and beyond fans recognising some occasional wardrobe choices, you probably wouldn't know who this person was supposed to be.
Of the supporting performances, Maron is reliable enough in the sort of brutally honest and practical manner he usually delivers, while Jena Malone brings some welcome charisma and snark with her take on Angie Bowie.
Flynn's take on Bowie sees him grapple with some soul-searching
Bowie emerges with his Ziggy Stardust persona
David Bowie's daughter, 20, pays tribute to late star with poignant childhood snap
Sadly, none of the relationships, particularly the vital sibling relationship of Bowie’s past fail to resonate and feel well-drawn enough to latch onto. Again, this mostly feels down to the script from director Gabriel Range, whose directorial style fails to make an impression despite still keeping proceedings somewhat watchable.
Ultimately, Stardust is a disappointing biopic of a musical Titan that fails to capture either the art and – most importantly – the artist.
Stardust fails to do justice to musical icon David Bowie, with the lack of his back catalogue feeling especially absent, along with an inability to capture his unique and otherworldly essence.
Stardust is available now on digital platforms in the UK.
What is your favourite biopic about a musician? Let us know in the comments below.